Head-to-head · 2026
Limozoft vs A to Z Dispatch: same team, two different products
Disclosure: Limozoft is our product. Pros and cons for A to Z Dispatch are drawn from public product pages and reviews as of July 2026.
Questions operators ask
How much does Limozoft cost for a taxi, limo or chauffeur fleet?+
How long does onboarding take vs Limo Anywhere or Moovs?+
Most operators who ask us this question are really asking one thing: do I need something custom, or do I need something that works on Monday? If the answer is Monday, that is Limozoft. The feature set is deliberately fixed so nothing is quoted, nothing is negotiated and nothing is billed per module — you pick a tier by fleet size and everything else comes with it.
A to Z Dispatch is the right call when the software has to bend around your business rather than the other way round: multiple brands under one roof, apps published under your own Apple and Google accounts, custom pricing engines, region-specific compliance work, or an integration nobody else has asked for. That work is scoped and quoted, which is why there is no price list.
Because both platforms share the same underlying engineering, there is no dead end. Operators who start on Limozoft and later need bespoke work move up to A to Z Dispatch without changing vendor, re-training dispatchers or re-keying their reservation history. 10 named operators — including Loyal Transportation, Baaz Limo and Millennium Limousine — run on A to Z Dispatch today, with published case studies at atozdispatch.com/case-studies.
At-a-glance comparison
| Limozoft | A to Z Dispatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship | Packaged product from the A to Z Dispatch engineering team | The underlying platform, sold and scoped directly |
| Best fit | Chauffeur / limo operators, 1–50 vehicles | Larger fleets, multi-brand groups, custom builds |
| Pricing | $399 one-time + $10–$30/mo by fleet size, published | Quoted per project after scoping |
| Feature scope | Fixed — every feature on every tier | Custom — built around your workflow |
| Time to launch | Next week (5 working days standard) | Depends on scope of custom work |
| Passenger & driver apps | Branded apps included on every plan | Fully white-labelled, published under your own developer accounts |
| Multi-brand / multi-tenant | Single brand per account | Multi-tenant billing and multiple brands supported |
| Custom integrations | Standard integrations only | Bespoke integrations in scope |
| Corporate & hotel portals | Included from Growth plan | Included and customisable |
| Contract | Month-to-month | Project-based, agreed up front |
| Named public case studies | Growing — see /case-studies | 10 published operator case studies |
| Upgrade path | Move up to A to Z Dispatch without switching vendor | n/a — already the top of the stack |
When A to Z Dispatch is the better pick
- You run more than about 50 vehicles, or several brands under one operating company.
- You need your passenger and driver apps published under your own Apple and Google developer accounts.
- You need a custom pricing engine, custom compliance reporting or an integration built specifically for you.
- You want a scoped project with a dedicated build team rather than an off-the-shelf package.
- You operate in a market with rules that need bespoke handling rather than a configuration toggle.
When Limozoft is the better pick
- You run 1–50 vehicles and want to be live next week, not next quarter.
- You want published, flat pricing you can budget against — $399 once, then $10–$30 a month.
- You want every feature included rather than a quote per module.
- You are replacing a legacy per-module system and want the bill to stop being a surprise.
- You would rather start small and move up later than pay for a custom build you may not need.
Pros & cons — Limozoft
Pros
- Published flat pricing: $399 one-time + $10–$30/mo by fleet size
- Every feature on every tier — booking site, dispatch, CRM, payments, driver app, corporate billing, payroll
- Branded passenger and driver apps included on every plan
- Live next week, month-to-month, no lock-in
- Backed by the same engineering team that runs A to Z Dispatch
Cons
- Single brand per account — no multi-brand operation
- No bespoke integrations or custom pricing engines
- Apps ship under our developer accounts, not yours
- Built for chauffeur and limo work, not taxi meters or delivery
Pros & cons — A to Z Dispatch
Pros
- Fully white-labelled — your apps in your own developer accounts
- Multi-tenant billing and multiple brands under one operation
- Custom workflows, pricing engines and bespoke integrations in scope
- 10 named operators with published case studies across the US, UK, Canada and Australia
- Commission-free: you keep 100% of your booking revenue
Cons
- No published price list — everything is quoted after scoping
- Longer time to launch when custom work is involved
- More platform than a 1–5 vehicle owner-operator needs
- Project-based commitment rather than month-to-month
A to Z Dispatch vs Limozoft — FAQ
Are Limozoft and A to Z Dispatch the same company?+
Which one is cheaper?+
Can I start on Limozoft and move to A to Z Dispatch later?+
Do both include a driver app?+
Which one do the named case-study operators use?+
Can I see both before deciding?+
Ready to see Limozoft alongside A to Z Dispatch?
15-minute walkthrough tailored to your fleet size — no slide deck.
Book a free demo →More: Limo dispatch software (2026 guide) · Best for small operators (1–15 vehicles) · All Limo Anywhere alternatives · Best limo dispatch software 2026 (slug: limozoft-vs-a-to-z-dispatch)